Sunday, September 15, 2019

Propaganda Then and Now


And the Egyptians did us (otanu) evil, and afflicted us, and imposed on us hard labor.       Deuteronomy 26:6
                                 

            While this translation seems cumbersome, it is more faithful to the Hebrew than the standard translation: “And the Egyptians treated us cruelly and afflicted us, and they imposed hard labor upon us.”

            Indeed, Netziv comments that, if the standard translation were correct, we would expect the verse to use the word “lanu” as does the verse in Parashat Ḥukkat: “And the Egyptians mistreated us (lanu) and our forefathers.” [Numbers 20:15] Based upon the unusual wording, Netziv understands the verse to mean “The Egyptians made us evil and ungrateful;” that is, the Egyptian propaganda presented the Israelites as an evil nation which plotted against the country which welcomed them in at their time of need.

            Netziv wrote these words more than one-hundred-twenty-five years ago and the verse itself was first stated more than three-thousand years ago. The overlap between Netziv’s understanding of the verse and Nazi propaganda of eighty years ago is astounding!

 

The Mother Bird and Jerusalem


If you come across a bird's nest with fledglings or eggs, on any tree or on the ground along the road, and the mother is sitting on the fledglings or eggs, you must not take the mother along with the young. You shall send away the mother, and (then) you may take the young for yourself, in order that it should be good for you, and you should lengthen your days.                                        Deuteronomy 22:6-7
            Thus the Torah presents the mitzva to send the mother bird away before taking her fledglings or eggs.
            Rosh (Rabbi Asher ben Yeḥiel 1250 – 1327), in his commentary on the verses, offers a fascinating homiletic interpretation:
“You shall send away the mother” – this is Jerusalem, which is the mother of the nation of Israel. “And (then) you may take the young for yourself” refers to Israel, for when they sinned Jerusalem was destroyed and God sent them away from Him, as the verse states “and your mother was sent away because of your transgressions.” [Isaiah 50:1], and so Jeremiah said “The Lord has exhausted His wrath, poured out His burning anger; He has ignited a fire in Zion, and it has consumed her foundations.” [Lamentations 4:11] When Israel sinned, the Holy One, blessed be He, wished to destroy His entire world, as Scripture states “If not for My covenant (understood as God’s covenant with Israel that they observe Torah) with the day and the night, I would not place the statutes of heaven and earth.” [Jeremiah 33:25] Instead, God said “I will destroy My house and assuage my anger on the wood and stones of the Temple.” “That it should be good for you.”
            The mitzva of sending away the mother bird hints at God’s mercy; rather than taking out His anger on His chosen nation He took it out on the wood and stones of the Temple.
            Indeed, our Sages [Midrash Eicha Rabba 4:14] connected the verse in Psalms [79:1] “A song of Asaph: God, the nations have invaded Your inheritance, desecrated Your holy temple, and turned Jerusalem into ruins” to the verse in Lamentations which Rosh quoted:
This is what is stated “The Lord has exhausted His wrath, poured out His burning anger; He has ignited a fire in Zion, and it has consumed her foundations;” it is written “A song of Asaph: God, the nations have invaded Your inheritance” should it not have stated Asaph cried and wept and lamented? Yet the verse says “a song of Asaph.” The parable is of a king who built a wedding canopy for his son, who then fell into bad ways; immediately the king tore the curtains and broke the poles of the canopy. The prince’s tutor took a flute and sang. Everyone said to the tutor “The king has destroyed his son’s wedding canopy and you sing!?” He answered “I sing because the king destroyed the canopy rather than taking out his anger on the prince.” Similarly, they said to Asaph “The Holy One, blessed be He, destroyed the Temple and you sing?” Asaph answered “I sing because God poured out His anger on wood and stone, and not on Israel.” This is what the verse says “He has ignited a fire in Zion, and it has consumed her foundations.”
            We may point out that what is said of the Holy City applies also to the Holy Land in general. Rabbi Moshe Ḥagiz (born in Jerusalem 1672, spent close to fifty years abroad as an emissary, returned to Israel, died in Zfat c. 1750) ) wrote that for the nation of Israel, the Land of Israel is like a mother, being struck and suffering for us, and she gives life to her sons. For this reason, she is called ‘’the Land of the Living.” [Psalms 27:13]
            In light of the approach of Maharal, that the sanctity of the Holy Land is derived from the presence within her of the Holy City, it is not surprising that both the City and the Land protect the nation of God who live within them. Truly, the City and the Land are the “mother of the nation of Israel.”

Wednesday, September 4, 2019

Justice, the Land and the City



Justice (ẓedek), justice shall you pursue, that you may live and possess the Land the Lord, your God, is giving you. Deuteronomy 16:20
     
While the Torah requires that we pursue justice in all places, as Rabbi Ovadya Sforno comments, our verse teaches that there is a unique connection between practicing justice and possessing the Land, in his words “The pursuit of justice is a greater imperative in the Land, for the failure to do so will prevent possessing the Land.” Indeed, Midrash Tanḥuma [Parashat Shofetim 7] states explicitly that our verse makes it clear that the pursuit of justice is the necessary condition for possessing the Land:

As the verse states: “Justice, justice shall you pursue, that you may live and possess the Land” – if you do not pursue justice you will not possess the Land.

            Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch adds that the Torah teaches the connection between justice and Israel’s nationality:

Justice is the highest unique goal, and the sole goal of the national entity of Israel … The concept of justice is forming all private and public matters in accordance with God’s Torah. Israel’s one task is to pursue this goal unceasingly with all devotion, “that you may live and possess the Land;” through this Israel will have done everything to secure its physical (“that you live”) and political (“and possess the Land”) existence. Here the political security of the Land, which is based upon acknowledging and caring for right and justice, is called “possession,” even after possession of the Land has been completed. The significant truth is thereby laid down that the possession of the Land comes into question every minute, and the Land has to be taken into possession afresh every minute by the Jewish state acknowledging tribute to “right and justice” and realizing this in the Land.

We may comment that what is true of the Land in general is equally true of her capital. Isaiah [1:26] prophesies that Jerusalem will be called “The city of justice.” However, Rashi comments that this will not be a new name given to the city, but a return to Jerusalem’s beginning, as Isaiah already referred to the Holy City as “full of justice.” [1:21]

The connection between justice and Jerusalem is so strong that her early kings, well before David turned the city into Israel’s eternal capital, had “ẓedek” as a component of their names. The first king of Jerusalem mentioned in the Bible is Malki- ẓedek [Genesis 14:18], and the city’s king at the time of the conquest of the Land by Joshua was named Adoni-ẓedek. [Joshua 10:3] In fact, Rashbam [Genesis 41:10] comments that just as “Pharaoh” was the name of all Egyptian monarchs and “Avimelech” of Philistine kings, so too “Malki-ẓedek” or “Adoni- ẓedek” was the official name of the kings of Jerusalem. Ibn Ezra [Ecclesiastes 1:1] explains simply that the meaning of the royal names is the king (Malki) or master (Adoni) of the place of justice.

            (The last king of the Davidic dynasty until the arrival of Messiah was named “Ẓidkiyahu.” While the name he was given by his father King Josiah was Matanya, and Ẓidkiyahu is the name the Babylonian king gave him when he installed him as king in place of his nephew Yehoyachin, nonetheless, the Bible consistently uses the name Ẓidkiyahu.)

            It should be noted that in Psalms [110:4] King David is referred to as “Malki-ẓedek,” as ibn Ezra writes: “The simple meaning (p’shat) of the psalm is reference to David.”

            Malbim [Isaiah 1:26] focuses our attention on the fact that “justice” refers to interpersonal relations (bein adam l’ḥavero). This comment explains both our Sages’ statement [Babylonian Talmud, Yoma 9b] that the Second Temple was destroyed because of unfounded hatred and Rabbi Kook’s insight that we will merit the rebuilding of Jerusalem when we reach the level of “unbounded love.” Since justice (bein adam l’ḥavero) is an essential aspect of the definition of the Eternal City, necessarily her existence depends upon bein adam l’ḥavero.

 

 

 

 

Friday, August 30, 2019

Teaching Our Children and Their Having Great Peace


All your children will be taught by God; your children will have great peace (shalom).   Isaiah 54:13  
                                                                  
            This is the third verse of the third of the seven haftarot of consolation.
In the opinion of Rabbi Hamnuna (a second generation Talmudic sage – late 3rd century C.E.), “Jerusalem was destroyed only because they neglected (the education of) school children;” [Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 119b] while the Sages teach in Tractate Yoma [9b] that the Second Temple was destroyed as the result of unfounded hatred.
            Rabbi Ḥayyim Yosef David Azulai (1724 – 1806) notes that our verse comforts Israel with the declaration that the redemption will surely arrive, and God promises, through Isaiah, that the causes of Jerusalem’s destruction will be removed:
“All your children will be taught by God” – the Torah education of your children will not be neglected; as well “your children will have great peace” – peace and unity will prevail among you and there will be no hatred.
            We may add that realizing “All your children will be taught by God” depends upon God and us, for if we do not take advantage of God’s readiness to teach our children, nothing will be gained. In contrast, realizing “your children will have great peace” is dependent solely upon us; God will not create the spirit of brotherhood and unity for the nation of Israel, only we ourselves can accomplish this.
            May we merit doing our part in order to hasten the arrival of the Righteous Redeemer.

Thursday, August 8, 2019

The Building Blocks for the Third Temple


 
            Ḥafetz Ḥayyim wrote:
If it were possible, every Israelite would willingly spend money and invest himself body and soul in helping to rebuild the Temple for the name of God. However, it is not necessary to spend any money, or to travel to Jerusalem for this purpose; all that is necessary is to guard one’s tongue and language to prevent blemishing them.  One who does this necessarily distances himself from lashon hara, arguments and anger, and from deceiving or embarrassing one’s fellow, all of which hinder the rebuilding of the Temple. Those who accomplish this certainly have great merit and through their positive behavior, they help rebuild the Temple.
            In his booklet Avodat Yemi Bein haMeẓarim v’Tisha b’Av, Rabbi Yoḥanan Eliyahu Rosenberg quotes Ḥafetz Ḥayyim, preceding his words with the heading “Between man and fellow-man: the building blocks for rebuilding the Temple.” Since the Second Temple was destroyed because of interpersonal sins (bein adam l’ḥavero), specifically as the result of sin’at ḥinam (unfounded hatred), the remedy and therefore the building blocks for the Third Temple is within the realm of bein adam l’ḥavero.
            The words of Ḥafetz Ḥayyim provide practical expression of Rabbi Kook’s comment:
Given that we were destroyed and the entire world destroyed with us due to unfounded hatred, we shall be rebuilt and the world rebuilt with us through unbounded love.
 

Mourning, Consolation and Repentance


 

            The spiritual content of the Jewish calendar from the seventeenth of Tammuz through Yom Kippur, a period of eighty-two days, consists of mourning, consolation and repentance. This content is expressed in customs and in the haftarot which are read on the Shabbatot of this period.

            Rabbi Yehuda Leib Tzirelson (1859 – 1941, chief rabbi of Bessarabia) notes that the order is exact and meaningful. The significance of mourning lies in understanding and recognizing that which is missing, what was and is no longer. One who does not understand what is lacking cannot begin the process of repentance since he does not understand the need to repent.

            Upon completion of the three week period of mourning the destruction of the Temples, following the fast of Tisha b’Av, we commence the period of consolation. For the seven weeks until Rosh haShana, the haftarot are the “Seven of Consolation.” Consolation, explains Rabbi Tzirelson, is the ability to see the strong points which remain and to understand that these are to be used to recover from the mourning and to build anew. This perception indeed is encouraging and comforting and paves the way towards repentance.

            Repentance is the actual work of rebuilding, abandoning the path which lead to loss and destruction and choosing a new path which will facilitate rectification and rebuilding.

            Indeed, our calendar presents a graduated program for the process of repentance.

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Israelites in the Jewish Quarter


 
Command the children of Israel and say to them: My offering, My food for My fire offerings, a spirit of satisfaction for Me, you shall take care to offer to Me at its appointed time.            
                                                                                      Numbers 28:2
 
“You shall take care” - The Kohanim, Levi’im and Israelites shall stand over the offerings; hence they instituted the ma’amdot.
              Rashi, based upon the Babylonian Talmud, Ta’anit 26aThe Kohanim , Levites, and Israelites shall stand over them [to watch them]; hence they instituted the ma’amodoth [representatives of the people who were present at the sacrificial services].
 

            Rashi’s comment brings us back to complete our virtual tour of the alleyways of the Jewish Quarter. For Parashat Naso we toured in the footsteps of the Levi’im, and Parashat Beha’alotcha in the footsteps of the Kohanim, we now return to the Quarter in the footsteps of the Israelites.

            Since the purchase of the daily perpetual sacrifices (t’midim) was financed by the half-shekels contributed by every adult male Israelite, the Israelites are the owners of the sacrifices, and therefore offering the t’midim required presence of all classes of Israelites: Kohanim, Levi’im and Israelites. In order to facilitate this, in parallel to the twenty-four mishmarot of Kohanim, the “early prophets” (Samuel and King David [Babylonian Talmud, Ta’anit 27a]) established twenty-four “ma’amdot” of Levi’im and Israelites, with each ma’amad paired with a specific mishmar of Kohanim.            When the mishmar’s week to work in the Temple arrived, the Kohanim and Levi’im ascended to Jerusalem and Israelites of the ma’amad “Gathered in their own cities, and read the narrative of creation.” [Mishna, Ta’anit 4:2]

            Maimonides writes that not all the members of the ma’amad “gathered in their own cities,” but:

Those (living) in Jerusalem or close to it would enter the Temple with the mishmar of Kohanim and Levi’im of that week; those members of the ma'amad who (lived) in distant places would gather in the synagogues of their locale. 

                                                            Laws of Temple Vessels 6:2

From Maimonides’ wording, it seems that there were not necessarily members of the ma’amad who resided in Jerusalem. However, Rashi [commentary on the Mishna] writes that “every ma’amad had members who were set in Jerusalem to be present at their brethren’s offerings,” implying that each ma’amad included residents of Jerusalem.

            As the mishmarot of Kohanim worked for one week and rotated on Shabbat, so it was with the ma’amad of Israelites. The job of the members of the ma’amad was not simple, as Maimonides defines it:

What would those who gather together - both in Jerusalem and in the synagogues - do? They would fast on the Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of their week. They would not fast on Friday out of respect for Shabbat and not on Sunday, so they would not make a transition from the pleasure of the Shabbat to a fast. [ibid. 6:3]

Monday through Thursday (inclusive) of their week, the members of the ma’mad fasted (from dawn until stars were visible).

            Whether in Jerusalem or in their own cities, members of the ma’amad did not engage in their own work, but “Their intention and their purpose was to deal with (Divine) service and prayer, and their minds and thoughts were focused on the sacrifices.” [Maimonides Commentary on the Mishna, Ta’anit 4:2]

            Aruch haShulḥan heAtid adds that “The essence of the ma’amad was not the fixed prayers, rather the supplications, requests and seeking favor which the members of the ma’amad devoted themselves to at length.” [Laws of Temple Vessels 26:17]

            In Maimonides’ opinion, members of the ma’amad prayed four daily prayers (in addition to the evening prayer, which takes place after the completion of the daily service in the Temple):

On every day of the week that was their ma'amad, they would recite four prayer services: the morning service, the afternoon service, the neilah service (the “closing service,” similar to the last prayers of Yom Kippur) and another prayer service between the morning service and the afternoon service which was additional (and unique) for them. [Laws of Temple Vessels 6:4]

Ra’avad differs with Maimonides and asserts that the ma’amad did not have an additional prayer, though he agrees that there was a neilah prayer. Thus, in Ra’avad’s opinion, there were three daily prayers, not four. Aruch haShulḥan heAtid proves that Maimonides decided the law in accordance with the opinion of the Jerusalem Talmud, while Ra’avad follows the Babylonian Talmud.

            As the Mishna notes, the prayers of the ma’amad included reading the Biblical narrative of creation, this in order to stress that “(Divine) service constitutes the perfection of existence, and for us, true service is the sacrifices; as our Sages taught if not for sacrifices, heaven and earth could not be maintained.” [Maimonides Commentary of Mishna, ibid.] During the morning and additional prayers, the narrative was read from a Torah scroll, with three men being called to the Torah, while at the afternoon prayer, the narrative was recited by heart. [Maimonides Laws of Temple Vessels 6:1] Maimonides follows his approach that the ma’amad prayed four times; in Ra’avad’s opinion, the narrative was read from a Torah scroll only once daily.

            Not every Israelite was worthy of being chosen as a member of the ma’amad, but they “selected Israelites who are fit, upright and sin-fearing.” [Maimonides, ibid.] Given the function of the ma’amad and its responsibility as “the agents of all Israel” these criteria are certainly understandable.

            The above comments highlight the significance of the fact that Parashat Pineḥas is read during the three weeks of mourning the Temples’ destruction; it is likely that reflecting on Ma’amdot Yisrael constitutes yearning for the period of Jerusalem’s greatest glory, the time when the Temple stood.

            “Bring back the Kohanim to their service, Levi’im to their song and music, and the Israelites to their habitation.” [From the Additional Prayer for the Festivals] Amen