|
Please let me cross (the Jordan).
Let me see the good land across the Jordan, the good mountain and the Lebanon. Deuteronomy 3:25
|
|
Thus
Moses pleaded with God.
The
Kotzker Rebbi (1787-1859) notes that Moses’ phrasing seems redundant, for if he
crosses the River Jordan, and enters western Eretz Yisrael, he will
certainly see the Land. The Kotzker explains that Moses’ intention is to “see”
the Land in its internal - spiritual dimension. It is possible to walk the
length and breadth of the Land of Israel without ever seeing her. Even one who
is involved in the study of Torah and fulfillment of mitzvot must pray that he
be privileged to see the internal – spiritual Land.
Two
verses later, we read God’s response to the Master of all Prophets:
|
Climb up to the top of Pisgah, and
lift up your eyes westward, and northward, and southward, and eastward, and
see with your eyes; for you shall not go over this Jordan. Deuteronomy
3:27
|
|
Here,
as well, there are seemingly unnecessary words. As Alshikh phrases it, among
the questions he raises on the verse: “Who does not understand that he (Moses) will see the Land only with his eyes?” What does the Torah add by including the
words “see with your eyes?”
Alshikh
answers that the Torah stresses that Moses actually saw the Land with his own
eyes, and not merely in a prophetic vision. Many of our classical commentators (among
them, Abravanel, Or haḤayyim and Malbim) follow this approach. (Or haḤayyim [who
died in 1743] adds that the words preclude the possibility that Moses used “the
wisdom that allows bringing nearer that which is far away by visual means,”
that is, Moses did not see the Land through a telescope!)
It
is perfectly clear that vision such as this, being able to see the entire Land
of “four hundred parasangs” (a unit equal to approximately four kilometers [2.5
miles] square) [Otzar haMidrashim 366], cannot be natural. Indeed Rabbi
Eliezer [Yalkut Shimoni, vaEtḥanan 823] states “(God) gave Moses eyes
the ability to see from one end of the world to the other. (And so we see that
righteous people have the ability to see from one end of the world to the
other.)” That being the case, the question arises: why did God instruct Moses
to ascend to the top of Pisgah? Surely, Moses would have been able to benefit
from this super-human vision even if he were standing in a plain, or even in a
valley. Alshikh explains that in order to benefit from this exceptional visual
acuity, Moses himself had to act, to do his part, and only then would God
bestow upon him the ability to see the entire Land.
Concerning
Rabbi Eliezer’s comment, Rabbi Kook related that during his enforced stay in
London (during the First World War) he often visited the National Art Gallery
and was especially impressed by Rembrandt’s use of light, which reminded Rabbi Kook
of the Sages’ saying that when God created light it was so strong that one could see from one end of the world to the other,
but G-d was afraid that the wicked might abuse it. What did He do? He reserved
that light for the righteous (tzadikim) when the Messiah should come.
Rabbi Kook concluded his comments on Rembrandt by saying: “But now and then
there are great men who are blessed and privileged to see it. I think that
Rembrandt was one of them, and the light in his pictures is the very light that
was originally created by God Almighty.”
If Rembrandt was gifted with the
primal power of vision, it is not surprising that the Master of all Prophets
was.
The story is told that a man once
came to the great kabbalist Rabbi Meir Abuḥatzeira and tearfully sought his
help in locating his son who had disappeared. Rabbi Meir entered into a trance
and drew a street map of London, marking a particular building and informing
the father that his son will be found there. Indeed, Rabbi Meir was correct.
Rabbi Meir’s attendant asked him if he had ever been to London, to which the
rabbi answered in the negative. The attendant then asked Rabbi Meir to explain
how he could have drawn the map for the father. Rabbi Meir answered, “we in the
Abuḥatzeira family have always been most careful in the matter of purity of
sight, and therefore, we have retained a portion of the primal vision of Adam.
Thus, I was able to see the son in that house in London!”
No comments:
Post a Comment