Moses took the
initiative, and followed by the elders of Israel, went over to Dathan and Abiram. Numbers 16:25
Resh Lakish said:
This teaches that one must not be stubborn in a matter of dissension. Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 110a
Moses
demonstrated his greatness by approaching those who were his juniors, rather
than insisting on his own honor. However, Moses was considered a king [Midrash
Tannaim, Deuteronomy 33:5] and the Halacha declares that a king may
not forego his honor. [Maimonides Laws of Kings 2:3] Thus, we can question
Moses’ decision to approach his antagonists.
The
reason a king may not waive his honor is the fact that it is not his personal
honor, rather that of the nation. Preventing dissension within the nation
certainly qualifies as national honor. Therefore, Moses taught that to prevent
dissension, a king may forego his personal honor. Or perhaps the lesson can be
phrased that preventing national dissension itself is the king’s honor.
No comments:
Post a Comment