|
What
is (the reason for) Ḥanukka? Our Sages taught: On the twenty-fifth of Kislev
the eight days of Ḥanukka commence, on which eulogizing the dead and fasting
are forbidden. For when the Greeks entered the Temple, they defiled all the
oils therein, and when the Hasmonean dynasty prevailed and defeated them,
they searched and found only one cruse of oil which lay with the seal of the
High Priest, but which contained sufficient for one day's lighting only; yet
a miracle was wrought therein and they lit (the menorah) therewith for eight
days. The following year these (days) were appointed a Festival with (the
recital of) Hallel and thanksgiving.
Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 21b
|
|
|
|
Bayit Hadash (Rabbi
Yoel Sirkis 1561 – 1640) asks why our Sages established Ḥanukka as a time for
recitation of Hallel and of thanksgiving, but not of feasting, as they did for
Purim, and answers that Purim involved the physical salvation of the Jewish
People, hence it is appropriate to manifest joy through feasting, while Ḥanukka
was the spiritual salvation of the nation, hence the material aspect of
commemoration is inappropriate.
Turei Zahav (Rabbi
David haLevi Segal 1586 – 1667) notes that there is a material aspect to the
miracle of Ḥanukka as well, since it came about through the miracle of Judah
Maccabees’ military victories, however, since this was not an overt miracle (as
it could be attributed to Judah’s military genius and his success as the leader
of a guerilla uprising), our Sages chose to focus on the overt miracle of the
oil. Thus, since the miracle of Purim relates to the physical salvation of the
Jews, it is celebrated with joy in this world [the physical act of feasting],
while Ḥanukka does not.
Rabbi Kook comments that it seemingly
would have been appropriate for our Sages to institute commemoration of the Ḥanukka
miracle with feasting and rejoicing, as they did for Purim, however, they chose
not to for a pragmatic reason: the struggle between Greek philosophy and
Judaism included the Greek ideal of enjoying all worldly and physical
pleasures, as an end in itself, versus the approach of traditional Judaism that
man’s physical nature must be subservient to his spiritual side, thus to
include feasting as part of the celebration of Ḥanukka was to risk conveying
the message of the value of the Greek approach. For this reason, our Sages
chose to limit the commemoration of Ḥanukka to the spiritual level of Hallel
and thanksgiving.
It is appropriate to quote the comment
of RaMa (Rabbi Moshe Isserles 1520 -1572): (though our Sages did not institute Ḥanukka as
days of feasting and rejoicing) some (authorities) say that there is some mitzva
in adding festive meals, and it is customary to sing songs of praise and then
it is considered a meal of mitzva. [Oraḥ Ḥayyim 670:2]
Rabbi Shlomo Luria (1510 – 1573) adds
that if the purpose of the meal is to praise God or to publicize the miracle,
it is considered a meal of mitzva.
No comments:
Post a Comment