Our
Sages taught us that there were three mitzvot which the Greeks wanted to
abolish: mila (circumcision); Shabbat and ḥodesh (proclaiming the
new month).
Sfat
Emet notes that at
first glance it is easier to understand the Greek opposition to mila and
Shabbat than to ḥodesh. However, the mitzva of ḥodesh was
targeted by the Greeks for a deep philosophical reason, explains Sfat Emet.
The Greeks deified nature. The mitzva of ḥodesh teaches that God
gave man the power to imbue time with sanctity. In this sense, ḥodesh teaches
that man is above nature. It is not the renewal of the moon which establishes
the new Hebrew month, but the Sanhedrin's proclamation of the new month. The
Jewish concept expressed by the mitzva of ḥodesh, that human
behavior has an influence on heaven, was antithetical to Greek philosophy, and
therefore the Greeks wanted to abolish ḥodesh.
Sfat
Emet adds that,
philosophically, Ḥanukka is similar to ḥodesh. The Hasmoneans' devotion
to Torah and mitzvot brought God to perform the miracle of Ḥanukka, and
brought about a renewal of the Temple as well as a renewal of the Jews'
connection to their spiritual roots. Ḥodesh is all about renewal. Ḥanukka
adds the dimension of renewal even at the "time of darkness," at the
end of the (lunar) month.
It
is not by chance that Ḥanukka includes Rosh Ḥodesh. Rosh Ḥodesh
is the beginning of renewal, while Ḥanukka is the culmination.
No comments:
Post a Comment