Thursday, February 9, 2017

Tu biShvat and Hanukka

            Though in contemporary times we relate to Tu biShvat as a holiday, it is not a true holiday. The earliest mention of the significance of the date is the Mishna’s statement [Rosh haShana 1:1] that the fifteenth of Shvat is the “new year for trees” (in the opinion of the House of Hillel, which is the accepted Halacha). The Mishna’s statement indeed conveys Halachic implications, as the relevance of this new year is in determining to which year of the six year cycle of ma’asrot (tithes) fruit belongs.
            Tu biShvat is mentioned in Shulḥan Aruch Oraḥ Ḥayyim only twice:

The custom is not to say taḥanun (penitential prayers) on the fifteenth of Shvat.                                                             131:6
The community does not institute a public fast on the fifteenth of Shvat, since it is the new year for trees.                            572:3

            Interestingly, Maimonides, in his codification of the Halacha [Mishneh Torah Laws of Prayer 5:15] omits Tu biShvat from the list of days on which it is customary to omit reciting taḥanun. Thus, it would seem that Tu biShvat was added to this list only sometime during the last eight hundred years.
            Rabbi Zalman Baruch Melamed notes two unique points concerning Tu biShvat versus all other holidays within the Jewish calendar. Firstly, other holidays commemorate historic events, while Tu biShvat does not. In essence, the other holidays look towards the past, while Tu biShvat looks to the future. This is especially true as the fifteen of Shvat is well before the trees will actually bear fruit. Secondly, every other holiday within our calendar commemorates a miraculous event, while Tu biShvat relates to nature, and conveys the message that nature is not independent of God, but is under His direct and constant supervision.
            It is worth noting that the holiday which precedes Tu biShvat is Hanukka. As we noted in a Dvar Torah for Hanukka, the concept of Divine supervision of nature was important in the Hanukka story as well. Greek culture and philosophy clashed with the traditional Jewish approach. The Greeks deified nature, while Judaism sees nature as being governed in a direct and ongoing way by the Almighty. Rabbi Yehoshua David Hartman phrases it thus: “for the Greeks, the miraculous was natural, while for Jews, nature is miraculous.”
            Thus, there is a conceptual continuity between the celebration of the Maccabean victory over the Greeks and the new year for trees.



No comments:

Post a Comment